Good point, found it, thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Dwarf-discuss <dwarf-discuss-bounces~sevaa=yarxi...@lists.dwarfstd.org> On Behalf Of David Anderson via Dwarf-discuss Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2024 6:02 PM To: dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org Subject: Re: [Dwarf-discuss] Aranges address entry alignment?
On 7/13/24 11:33, Vsevolod Alekseyev via Dwarf-discuss wrote: > “This header is followed by a series of tuples. Each tuple consists of > an address and a length, each in the size appropriate for an address > on the target architecture. The first tuple following the header in > each set begins at an offset that is a multiple of the size of a > single tuple (that is, twice the size of an address). The header is > padded, if necessary, to the appropriate boundary. Each set of tuples > is terminated by a 0 for the address and 0 for the length.” > > Note the third sentence: > > “The first tuple following the header in each set begins at an offset > that is a multiple of the size of a single tuple (that is, twice the > size of an address).” > > Meanwhile in DWARFv4, section 6.1.2, which describes the same, the > corresponding fragment goes: > In dwarf2, dwarf3, and dwarf4 and dwarf5 every Section 7 description has that requirement. Section 7 is (usually) the 'formal' data layout description. The section 6 descriptions match too, and do not mention that offset alignment requirement. David Anderson -- The way a government treats refugees is very instructive because it shows you how they would treat the rest of us if they thought they could get away with it. -- Tony Benn, British MP 1950-2001 -- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss -- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
