The back story here is that I am trying to implement the new language attributes in LLVM, which is why I'm finding all these bugs, omissions, and ambiguities:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89980 cheers, Adrian > On Apr 24, 2024, at 2:25 PM, Adrian Prantl via Dwarf-discuss > <dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote: > > # C standard release dates for DW_AT_language_version, clarify semantics > > ## Background > > The list of languages at https://dwarfstd.org/languages-v6.html does not list > release dates for the ISO C standard. Producers need to know what version > numbers they should produce though. I scanned the ISO website for appropriate > dates to use. > > ## Proposed Changes > > Augment the table of language encodings to add > C (K&R and ISO) DW_LNAME_C 0x0003 0 YYYYMM > > K&R 000000 > C89 198912 > C99 199912 > C11 201112 > C17 201806 (sic!) > C2x >201806 > > Add the following non-normative wording: > > To convert a version number to a specific release, it is good practice to > treat the YYYMM version numbers listed in this document as the maximum > version that is interpreted as belonging to a specific release. This way > consumers can emit version numbers for unreleased upcoming specifications, by > using, e.g., the date the compiler was built. > > ## Dependencies > > Issue 210419.1 > > ## References > > https://iso-9899.info/wiki/The_Standard > > C89: https://www.iso.org/standard/17782.html > C99: https://www.iso.org/standard/29237.html > C11: https://www.iso.org/standard/57853.html > C17: https://www.iso.org/standard/74528.html > > https://dwarfstd.org/languages-v6.html > -- > Dwarf-discuss mailing list > Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss -- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
