Hi, thank you for creating the tracking issue, highly appreciated! > For DW_LNAME_Ruby, I gave it the version scheme VVMM, which seems to > match the version numbering system used for Ruby releases; please let > me know if that's not the right scheme to use.
I think VVMMPP would be more accurate, but either way should work fine. On Friday, 5 January 2024 at 08:30, Cary Coutant via Dwarf-discuss <dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org> wrote: > > I would like to request addition of a new language code for the Ruby[1] > > language. > > > > Based on the latest snapshot[2] (from December 5th, 2023) the required > > changes are as follows: > > > > [Section 3.1.1, p 65, Table 3.1. Language Names] - Add > > > > DW_LNAME_Ruby Ruby > > > > [Section 7.12, p 243, Table 7.17. Language Encodings] - Add > > > > DW_LNAME_Ruby 0x0026 0 > > > Thanks for the submission! This is issue 231230.1: > > https://dwarfstd.org/issues/231230.1.html > > I've assigned language codes for both DWARF 5 and DWARF 6 as follows: > > DW_LANG_Ruby 0x0040 > DW_LNAME_Ruby 0x0026 > > For DW_LNAME_Ruby, I gave it the version scheme VVMM, which seems to > match the version numbering system used for Ruby releases; please let > me know if that's not the right scheme to use. The default lower bound > for array indexing is 0. > > -cary > -- > Dwarf-discuss mailing list > Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss -- Dwarf-discuss mailing list Dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org https://lists.dwarfstd.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
