On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:34:01PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Dwarf-Discuss wrote: > Which brings another question, shouldn't we add > > DW_ATE_complex_int > > as a standard code?
Actually, we need to differentiate DW_ATE_complex_signed_int and DW_ATE_complex_unsigned_int Jakub _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org