Hopefully not to side-track things too much... maybe wants its own thread, if there's more to debate here.
>> For the case you suggested where it would be useful to keep the range >> list for the CU in the .o file, I think .debug_aranges is what you're >> looking for. > > aranges has been off by default in LLVM for a while - it adds a lot of > overhead (doesn't have all the nice rnglist encodings for instance - > nor can it use debug_addr, and if it did it'd still be duplicate with > the CU ranges wherever they were). Did you want to file an issue to improve how .debug_aranges works? Complaining that it duplicates CU ranges is missing the point, though; it's an index, like .debug_names, of course it duplicates other info. If you want to suggest an improved index, like we did with .debug_names, that would be great too. --paulr _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
