On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:16 AM David Anderson <dave...@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> On 7/25/19 8:12 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > > No examples in F.2 F.3 show the corresponding compllation-unit > > header > > unit_type. Which leaves open the question of what the > > compilation-unit > > header unit_type is in the examples. > > > > > > Are you uncertain as to which unit_type would be used in which unit in > > the examples (after having read Section 7)? Or is it that you know the > > answer now, and it would've been easier/faster to find if the examples > > had been more explicit? > > At the moment, yes. > OK: DW_UT_compile -> DW_TAG_compile_unit (in debug_info) DW_UT_type -> DW_TAG_type_unit (in debug_info) DW_UT_partial -> DW_TAG_partial_unit (in debug_info) DW_UT_skeleton -> DW_TAG_skeleton_unit (in debug_info) DW_UT_split_unit -> DW_TAG_compile_unit (in debug_info.dwo) DW_UT_split_type -> DW_TAG_type_unit (in debug_info.dwo) (this mapping comes from 7.5.1.* bullet 3 (unit_type)) Is that sufficient information to address your uncertainty? Or are there other questions/have I misunderstood your uncertainty? > > > > > (it seems there's limited ambiguity from section 7 - such that the > > examples don't need to clarify much in this regard, but yeah - seems > > OK to me that they could describe the header now that the header's a > > bit more complicated) > > Until DWARF 5 there was really no issue in this regard. > > Ensuring that examples for which the compilation-unit DIE TAG and/or > unit_type matter > mention both values would help standard-readers. > Help is what examples are for :-) > > Thanks. > DavidA > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
