Filed as bug #23310 at sourceware.org/bugzilla. --paulr
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dwarf-Discuss [mailto:dwarf-discuss-boun...@lists.dwarfstd.org] On > Behalf Of Paul Robinson via Dwarf-Discuss > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 1:06 PM > To: ni...@redhat.com; dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > Cc: binut...@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Asm syntax for DWARF 5 line table info > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nick Clifton [mailto:ni...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 10:01 AM > > To: Robinson, Paul; dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > > Cc: binut...@sourceware.org > > Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Asm syntax for DWARF 5 line table info > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > >>> I propose to add a new optional clause to the .file directive, like > > so: > > >>> > > >>> .file filenumber [ "directory" ] "path" [ md5 checksum ] > > > > This suggestion is fine with me. (And the file 0 enhancement). > > Thanks! > > > Are you offering to provide an implementation ? > > I implemented it in LLVM. I am not offering to implement it in GNU > binutils > as I can't say I know my way around there, or know the current state of > gcc/binutils support for DWARF v5 in general. > > > It would help if you could file an enhancement request in the FSF > binutils > > bugzilla system, so that we can track any further correspondence on this > > issue. > > Sure. Is that sourceware.org/bugzilla? It doesn't seem to like the > account I created for gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla a few years ago, but maybe they > are separate? Private reply is fine. > Thanks, > --paulr > > > > > Cheers > > Nick > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dwarf-Discuss mailing list > Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
