On 03/17/2017 09:07 AM, I wrote > Now this is interesting wording. Because it says 'described location'. > I think there is a strong case for arguing that a register name does > describe a 'thing' that held a value. And it says 'register location > description' which is precisely 2.6.1.1.3 which reaffirms that > idea. .
Having said the above I think this use of 'register location description' is an example of a place in the Dwarf5 standard where a link (to 2.6.1.1.3 ) would be a distinct improvement. An improvement because it draws attention to that phrase as having a very specific interpretation in the standard, making the reader's job easier without adding visible text. DavidA. _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
