Hi, Reading the DWARF5 proposal debug_aranges and address-less CUs http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=100430.2 I saw it said: "Rejected -- Recommend adding this as "best practice" on the wiki."
I rather see this in the standard as non-normative text to be honest, but at least documenting this seems a good idea. I looked and found http://wiki.dwarfstd.org/index.php?title=Best_Practices but there this issue isn't mentioned yet. Could someone update it? The suggested text was: "If a compiler generates .debug_aranges sections, it should generate them for all compilation units, even when a compilation unit has no address ranges. This allows a consumer to distinguish between a compilation unit that has no ranges from a compilation unit generated by a compiler that does not generate .debug_aranges sections." Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
