On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Mark Wielaard <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I saw the following issue which proposed DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03 and > DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11. It appears to have been accepted for DWARF4 > according to this page: > http://www.dwarfstd.org/Issues.php?type=closed3 > But apparently didn't make it into the actual DWARF4 spec. > > Now I notice DWARF4 came out in 2010, so at least DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11 > would be speculative. Was it misfiled and is this a proposal for DWARF5 > instead?
It's marked as accepted as of 11/27/12 so ... > > Asking because I was wondering if it would make sense to propose > DW_LANG_C11 (ISO/IEC 9899:2011) for DWARF5? I guess? Were there any language specific changes that would be important for consumers of debug info? -eric > > Thanks, > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Dwarf-Discuss mailing list > Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org > http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org _______________________________________________ Dwarf-Discuss mailing list Dwarf-Discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
