Several thoughts: o The structure of your metadata may not lend itself to a neat mapping to a two-level hierarchy, which is all that DSpace can manipulate directly.
o You probably have a lot of fields that *could* be shoehorned into DC terms by a sufficiently flexible mind, but likely should not be. Find or build a set of concepts that fit well what you have. o You may wind up using several separate schemae to describe different aspects of your holdings. This could be a good thing. o I'm convinced that there are already standards out there which will accommodate many if not all of your existing fields. I just wish I could name them for you! o Standards make your holdings more discoverable. I would try *hard* to work with existing standards. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [email protected] Asking whether markets are efficient is like asking whether people are smart.
pgp3Vb0EGzaj8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________ Dspace-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-general
