----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > Von: "tytso" <[email protected]> > An: "richard" <[email protected]> > CC: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <[email protected]>, "Gao Xiang" > <[email protected]>, "Jan Kara" <[email protected]>, "Chao > Yu" <[email protected]>, "Dave Chinner" <[email protected]>, "David > Sterba" <[email protected]>, "Miao Xie" > <[email protected]>, "devel" <[email protected]>, "Stephen > Rothwell" <[email protected]>, "Darrick" > <[email protected]>, "Christoph Hellwig" <[email protected]>, "Amir > Goldstein" <[email protected]>, > "linux-erofs" <[email protected]>, "Al Viro" > <[email protected]>, "Jaegeuk Kim" <[email protected]>, > "linux-kernel" <[email protected]>, "Li Guifu" > <[email protected]>, "Fang Wei" <[email protected]>, > "Pavel Machek" <[email protected]>, "linux-fsdevel" > <[email protected]>, "Andrew Morton" > <[email protected]>, "torvalds" <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. August 2019 19:46:21 > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] erofs: move erofs out of staging
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> > So holding a file system like EROFS to a higher standard than say, >> > ext4, xfs, or btrfs hardly seems fair. >> >> Nobody claimed that. > > Pointing out that erofs has issues in this area when Gao Xiang is > asking if erofs can be moved out of staging and join the "official > clubhouse" of file systems could certainly be reasonable interpreted > as such. Reporting such vulnerablities are a good thing, and > hopefully all file system maintainers will welcome them. Doing them > on a e-mail thread about promoting out of erofs is certainly going to > lead to inferences of a double standard. Well, this was not at all my intention. erofs raised my attention and instead of wasting a new thread I answered here and reported what I found while looking at it. That's all. Thanks, //richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
