On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:54:51PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> > > static ssize_t show_attr(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
> > > *attr, char *buf)
> > > {
> > > - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > - struct kp2000_device *pcard;
> > > -
> > > - if (!pdev) return -ENXIO;
> > > - pcard = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > - if (!pcard) return -ENXIO;
> > > + struct kp2000_device *pcard = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > Wait, dev_get_drvdata() is not returning you the same pointer that
> > pci_get_drvdata() does. So I think this is now broken :(
> >
>
> It looks sort of weird but it's fine.
>
> > What this should look like is this:
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > struct kp200_device *pcard = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > if (!pcard)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > that is IF the driver really is setting the pci dev data to NULL when
> > the device is removed from the driver. Is it?
>
> Yes. The pci_get_drvdata() is only set to NULL after we remove the
> sysfs files so pci_get_drvdata() always returns a valid pointer.
Ugh, I am wrong, it's not as if I didn't actually write the
dev_get_drvdata() and pci_get_drvdata() code 15+ years ago, you would
think I would have remembered something like this :(
Anyway, patches look good, sorry for the noise...
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
