Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 9:30 PM Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> The driver should really call dm365_isif_setup_pinmux() through a callback,
> but it runs platform specific code by itself, which never actually compiled:
>
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c:2028:2: error:
> implicit declaration of function 'davinci_cfg_reg'
> [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> davinci_cfg_reg(DM365_VIN_CAM_WEN);
> ^
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c:2028:2: error:
> this function declaration is not a prototype [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c:2028:18: error:
> use of undeclared identifier 'DM365_VIN_CAM_WEN'
> davinci_cfg_reg(DM365_VIN_CAM_WEN);
> ^
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c:2029:18: error:
> use of undeclared identifier 'DM365_VIN_CAM_VD'
> davinci_cfg_reg(DM365_VIN_CAM_VD);
> ^
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c:2030:18: error:
> use of undeclared identifier 'DM365_VIN_CAM_HD'
> davinci_cfg_reg(DM365_VIN_CAM_HD);
> ^
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c:2031:18: error:
> use of undeclared identifier 'DM365_VIN_YIN4_7_EN'
> davinci_cfg_reg(DM365_VIN_YIN4_7_EN);
> ^
> /git/arm-soc/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_isif.c:2032:18: error:
> use of undeclared identifier 'DM365_VIN_YIN0_3_EN'
> davinci_cfg_reg(DM365_VIN_YIN0_3_EN);
> ^
> 7 errors generated.
Which tree and which config is this?
This driver compiles fine with m68k/allmodconfig on v5.0?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
