On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:54:38AM +0530, Ajay Singh wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:31:28 +0300
> Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 23.08.2018 13:33, Ajay Singh wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:12:08 +0300
> > > Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 14.08.2018 09:50, Ajay Singh wrote:
> > >>> Cleanup patch to avoid line over 80 chars issue reported by
> > >>> checkpatch.pl script.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ajay Singh <[email protected]>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c | 7 ++++++-
> > >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> > >>> b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c index 041c9dd..f0743d9
> > >>> 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> > >>> @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ static inline int add_tcp_pending_ack(struct
> > >>> wilc_vif *vif, u32 ack, return 0;
> > >>> }
> > >>>
> > >>> +static inline void clear_tcp_session_txq(struct wilc_vif *vif,
> > >>> int index) +{
> > >>> + vif->ack_filter.pending_acks_info[index].txqe = NULL;
> > >>> +}
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> This seems useless to me...
> > >
> > > Sorry, this point is not fully clear to me.
> > >
> > > Did you mean setting of 'NULL' to 'pending_acks_info[index].txqe' is
> > > not required?
> > >
> >
> > No, having a new function that sets a variable just to avoid line
> > over 80 warning.
>
> Okay got it.
> How about using a temp variable to hold the value of
> 'tqe->tcp_pending_ack_idx'. It can also help to overcome the
> checkpatch warning.
Just ignore the checkpatch warning... Don't add a temporary variable
just to please checkpatch... It's good to fix checkpatch warnings if
it makes the code cleaner, but I hate when people do:
tmp = some_long_variable_name;
some_other_long_variable = tmp;
The tmp variable is only used one time and a simple statement becomes
two statements and it breaks grep.
You could consider renaming some of the variables. I think the "_info"
doesn't add anything, because obviously it's information. Maybe
"tcp_pending_ack_index" could just become "->ack_idx".
vif->ack_filter.pending_ack[tqe->ack_idx].txqe = NULL;
It's still very searchable. If you grep for "ack_idx" then the pending
and TCP are right there so no information is lost.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
