On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * KY Srinivasan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am confused. The label ipi_mask_done was introduced in this patch
> > (the patch under question fixes a circular dependency in this patch):
> >
> > commit 68bb7bfb7985df2bd15c2dc975cb68b7a901488a
> > Author: K. Y. Srinivasan <[email protected]>
> > Date: Wed May 16 14:53:31 2018 -0700
> >
> > X86/Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments
> >
> > Hyper-V supports hypercalls to implement IPI; use them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]>
> >
> > This patch was committed by Thomas some weeks ago and is in linux-next.
> > This patch is also in 4.18-rc3.
>
> And then that name was changed to a different label in:
>
> 4bd06060762b: x86/hyper-v: Use cheaper HVCALL_SEND_IPI hypercall when
> possible
>
> So maybe you were testing on an older kernel. Could you try the latest -tip?
The problem is that the wreckage is in Linus tree and needs to be fixed
there, i.e. via x86/urgent.
Now we have the new bits queued in x86/hyperv already which collide. So we
need to merge x86/urgent into x86/hyperv after applying the fix and mop up
the merge wreckage in x86/hyperv.
I'll have a look tomorrow morning unless you beat me to it.
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
