On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 02:38:09PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 07:53:08PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 20 2018, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The data passed between irq related functions and the ones which have
> > > > > been retrieved where different. Also first data haven't properly
> > > > > set on irq_domain_add_linear call where it was passing NULL instead.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
> > > > Tested-by: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > NeilBrown
> > >
> > > Thanks, Neil.
> > >
> > > So I'll send v5 of this series to make things easier.
> > > I'll join this PATCH with PATCH 5 and make TODO file
> > > empty.
> >
> >
> > Ugh, I'm totally confused now. What is the "correct" patch series to
> > consider for merging here? v5? Something else?
>
> Actually to make it easier on my side (which I need to optimize for due
> to the heavy patch load), I've dropped all of your patches in my queue.
> Please resend whatever I have not yet applied that is ready to be
> considered for merging.
>
> thanks,
I have just resent v5 as you are point out here.
>
> greg k-h
Best regards,
Sergio Paracuellos
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
