> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 9:08 AM
> To: Rui Miguel Silva <[email protected]>; Anson Huang
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Steve Longerbeam
> <[email protected]>; Philipp Zabel <[email protected]>; Rob
> Herring <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <[email protected]>; Ryan Harkin <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] clk: imx7d: fix mipi dphy div parent
> 
> Anson,
> 
> Please have a look at this change.
> 
> Shawn
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva wrote:
> > Fix the mipi dphy root divider to mipi_dphy_pre_div, this would remove
> > a orphan clock and set the correct parent.
> >
> > before:
> > cat clk_orphan_summary
> >                                  enable  prepare  protect
> >    clock                          count    count    count        rate   
> > accuracy   phase
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  mipi_dphy_post_div                   1        1        0           0       
> >    0 0
> >     mipi_dphy_root_clk                1        1        0           0       
> >    0 0
> >
> > cat clk_dump | grep mipi_dphy
> > mipi_dphy_post_div                    1        1        0           0       
> >    0 0
> >     mipi_dphy_root_clk                1        1        0           0       
> >    0 0
> >
> > after:
> > cat clk_dump | grep mipi_dphy
> >    mipi_dphy_src                     1        1        0    24000000        
> >   0 0
> >        mipi_dphy_cg                  1        1        0    24000000        
> >   0 0
> >           mipi_dphy_pre_div          1        1        0    24000000        
> >   0 0
> >              mipi_dphy_post_div      1        1        0    24000000        
> >   0 0
> >                 mipi_dphy_root_clk   1        1        0    24000000        
> >   0 0
> >
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <[email protected]>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <[email protected]>

Two sign-off?

Otherwise, the patch looks ok to me.
Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c
> > index 975a20d3cc94..f7f4db2e6fa6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx7d.c
> > @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static void __init imx7d_clocks_init(struct
> device_node *ccm_node)
> >     clks[IMX7D_LCDIF_PIXEL_ROOT_DIV] =
> imx_clk_divider2("lcdif_pixel_post_div", "lcdif_pixel_pre_div", base +
> 0xa300, 0, 6);
> >     clks[IMX7D_MIPI_DSI_ROOT_DIV] =
> imx_clk_divider2("mipi_dsi_post_div", "mipi_dsi_pre_div", base + 0xa380, 0,
> 6);
> >     clks[IMX7D_MIPI_CSI_ROOT_DIV] =
> imx_clk_divider2("mipi_csi_post_div", "mipi_csi_pre_div", base + 0xa400, 0,
> 6);
> > -   clks[IMX7D_MIPI_DPHY_ROOT_DIV] =
> imx_clk_divider2("mipi_dphy_post_div", "mipi_csi_dphy_div", base +
> 0xa480, 0, 6);
> > +   clks[IMX7D_MIPI_DPHY_ROOT_DIV] =
> > +imx_clk_divider2("mipi_dphy_post_div", "mipi_dphy_pre_div", base +
> > +0xa480, 0, 6);
> >     clks[IMX7D_SAI1_ROOT_DIV] = imx_clk_divider2("sai1_post_div",
> "sai1_pre_div", base + 0xa500, 0, 6);
> >     clks[IMX7D_SAI2_ROOT_DIV] = imx_clk_divider2("sai2_post_div",
> "sai2_pre_div", base + 0xa580, 0, 6);
> >     clks[IMX7D_SAI3_ROOT_DIV] = imx_clk_divider2("sai3_post_div",
> > "sai3_pre_div", base + 0xa600, 0, 6);
> > --
> > 2.17.0
> >
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to