> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:30 PM
> To: Bogdan Purcareata <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment
> 
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:11:35PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> > @@ -93,10 +100,10 @@
> >   * buffers large enough to allow building an skb around them and also
> account
> >   * for alignment restrictions
> >   */
> > -#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE \
> > +#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE(priv) \
> >     (DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_SIZE + \
> >     SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + \
> > -   DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_ALIGN)
> > +   (priv)->rx_buf_align)
> >
> 
> Not related to this patch, but this macro is ugly.  It would be better
> as function.

Okay, will change the macros to inline functions in v2, where applicable.

Thank you!
Bogdan P.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to