On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Reshetova, Elena
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600
>> Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others]
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
>> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
>> > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
>> > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
>> > > situations.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <[email protected]>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <[email protected]>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
>> > > Signed-off-by: David Windsor <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
>
> Getting back on this: could you take the patch via your tree or should I 
> resubmit to some dedicated place with a new review-by added?

Sorry, for some reason I had assumed this would all go as part of the
larger series.  I applied it to my pci/host-hv branch with Stephen's
reviewed-by for v4.12.

Thanks for the ping!

Bjorn
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to