On Monday, October 17, 2016 10:23:00 PM CEST Patrick Farrell wrote: > Arnd, > > > The description and the actual patch don't seem to match up. Am I missing > something?
Sorry, I pasted the wrong error message when writing the changelog. > From: lustre-devel <[email protected]> on behalf of Arnd > Bergmann <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:08:55 PM > To: Oleg Drokin > Cc: [email protected]; Arnd Bergmann; Greg Kroah-Hartman; > [email protected]; Linus Torvalds; [email protected] > Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/28] staging: lustre: restore initialization > of return code > > A recent rework removed the initialization of the successful return > code from lpfc_write_firmware: > > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_write_firmware': > drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:10333:214: error: format '%ld' expects argument > of type 'long int', but argument 9 has type 'size_t {aka const unsigned int}' > [-Werror=format=] > > This adds it back. It should have been this warning: drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c: In function 'lov_getstripe': drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:426:9: error: 'rc' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] return rc; ^~ drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c:313:6: note: 'rc' was declared here Arnd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
