On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 02:49:12PM -0700, Nadim Almas wrote: > Fixed coding style issue. > > Signed-off-by: Nadim Almas <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c > index e794056..bc15584 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c > @@ -554,7 +554,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_lsr(struct dgnc_board *brd, > uint port) > * Rx Oruns. Exar says that an orun will NOT corrupt > * the FIFO. It will just replace the holding register > * with this new data byte. So basically just ignore this. > - * Probably we should eventually have an orun stat in our > driver... > + * Probably we should eventually have an orun stat in our > + * driver... > */ > ch->ch_err_overrun++; > }
Why did you just fix only one of these warnings in the file? You aren't going to send one patch per instance of this warning in this file, are you? Please group it all into one. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
