I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c index 107314e..4812c1f 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ #include "ldlm_internal.h" int ldlm_enqueue_min = OBD_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT; -module_param(ldlm_enqueue_min, int, 0644); +module_param(ldlm_enqueue_min, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(ldlm_enqueue_min, "lock enqueue timeout minimum"); /* in client side, whether the cached locks will be canceled before replay */ -- 2.9.2 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
