On Monday, June 13, 2016 4:07:34 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> The semaphore 'txq_add_to_head_cs' is a simple mutex, so it should be
> written as one. Semaphores are going away in the future.
Looks good to me.
> Also, removing
> the timeout scenario as the error handling code does not propagate the
> timeout properly.
Good catch! I guess wilc_wlan_handle_txq() running into a timeout
would end putting the semaphore in a state in which we never again
block on it because the count is now one higher than it should be.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
