> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 7:13 PM
> To: Pan Lijun-B44306 <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; Yoder Stuart-B08248 <[email protected]>;
> katz Itai-RM05202 <[email protected]>; Rivera Jose-B46482
> <[email protected]>; Li Yang-Leo-R58472 <[email protected]>;
> Wood Scott-B07421 <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Hamciuc
> Bogdan-BHAMCIU1 <[email protected]>; Marginean Alexandru-R89243
> <[email protected]>; Sharma Bhupesh-B45370
> <[email protected]>; Erez Nir-RM30794
> <[email protected]>; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: fsl-mc: define a macro to differentiate root
> dprc
> 
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 05:41:20PM -0500, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > Define is_root_dprc(dev) to tell whether a device is root dprc or not
> > via platform_bus_type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc.h | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc.h
> > b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc.h
> > index a933291..483763e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc.h
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> >  #include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include "../include/dprc.h"
> >
> >  #define FSL_MC_VENDOR_FREESCALE    0x1957
> > @@ -109,6 +110,15 @@ struct fsl_mc_resource {
> >  #define FSL_MC_IS_DPRC     0x0001
> >
> >  /**
> > +  * root dprc's parent is a platform device
> > +  * that platform device's bus type is platform_bus_type.
> > +  */
> > +#define is_root_dprc(dev) \
> > +   ((to_fsl_mc_device(dev)->flags & FSL_MC_IS_DPRC) && \
> > +   ((dev)->bus == &fsl_mc_bus_type) && \
> > +   ((dev)->parent->bus == &platform_bus_type))
> > +
> 
> It's best to make this type of thing a static inline function, to ensure you 
> get the
> correct typechecking.
> 

I will take your suggestion and make changes in patch v2.
Lijun


> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to