On 08/12/15 22:14, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Change the internal namespace for links between two pads to
> have the "pad" there.
>
> We're also numbering it, as a common constructor is to do
> things like:
>
> if (link->port1.type != MEDIA_GRAPH_PAD)
> continue;
> if (link->pad1_sink->entity == entity)
> /* do something */
>
> by preserving the number, we keep consistency between
> port1 and pad1_sink, and port0 and pad0_source.
I would really leave this patch out. As long as sink and source are consistently
used for pads (and they are), then I see no benefit at all to this change.
Another reason why I don't like this is that pad0_ and pad1_ are actually
confusing since they suggested to me when I first read it that pad0_ referred to
the pad with index 0 and pad1_ referred to the pad with index 1.
That's obviously not the case, but it does mean that the prefix doesn't really
make things clearer.
I would just stick with source and sink.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
