On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Peter Senna Tschudin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Sparse compalins about casting void * to u64 on i386.
>> Change the cast to resource_size_t.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> Tested by compilation only. Tested for x86 and x86_64.
>>
>> drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_nand.c | 3 ++-
>> include/linux/goldfish.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_nand.c
>> b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_nand.c
>> index d68f216..738fdc4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_nand.c
>> @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ static u32 goldfish_nand_cmd(struct mtd_info *mtd, enum
>> nand_cmd cmd,
>> writel((u32)(addr >> 32), base + NAND_ADDR_HIGH);
>> writel((u32)addr, base + NAND_ADDR_LOW);
>> writel(len, base + NAND_TRANSFER_SIZE);
>> - gf_write64((u64)ptr, base + NAND_DATA, base +
>> NAND_DATA_HIGH);
>> + gf_write64((resource_size_t)ptr, base + NAND_DATA,
>> + base + NAND_DATA_HIGH);
>
> I guess sparse still complains if CONFIG_X86_PAE=y, which makes
> resource_size_t u64?
Yes, when CONFIG_X86_PAE=y the patch doesn't fix the warning(gcc
warning). What is the correct/portable way of fixing this?
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> [email protected]
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
--
Peter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
