-----Original Message----- From: Jes Sorensen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 2:13 PM To: Sharma, Sanjeev Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging:rtl8723au: core: Fix error reported by checkpatch.
Sanjeev Sharma <[email protected]> writes: > This is a patch to the rtw_cmd.c file that fixes Error reported by > checkpatch. > > Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c | 83 > +++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c > index 4eaa502..c1f6254 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c > @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static void traffic_status_watchdog(struct rtw_adapter > *padapter) > /* check traffic for powersaving. */ > if (((pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod + > pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumTxOkInPeriod) > 8) || > - pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod >2) > + pmlmepriv->LinkDetectInfo.NumRxUnicastOkInPeriod > > 2) > bEnterPS = false; > else > bEnterPS = true; This makes the line longer than 80 characters, that is worse than the 'problem' you are fixing. Jes Hello jes, How it can be worse because checkpatch treating this as an Error and line longer than 80 character is warning reported by checkpatch and I could see that in entire staging directory, every maintainer most of the time ignore the 80 column limit and give priority to Error. Please let me know your comment . Sanjeev Sharma _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
