Hi, Dan
2014-10-08 20:37 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>:
> All three of these patches are good and a nice improvement. This one is
> a good bugfix. I have some notes for later, though below.
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:13:56PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c b/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
>> index 7c79fe6..00f34b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/dgap/dgap.c
>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for the Digi International EPCA
>> PCI based product lin
>> MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE("dgap");
>>
>> static int dgap_start(void);
>> +static void dgap_stop(void);
>
> These kinds of forward declarations are annoying. The whole file needs
> to be re-arranged so that we don't have to deal with them.
OK. I will try to re-arrange and remove forward declarations.
>
>> @@ -561,6 +563,21 @@ failed_class:
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> +static void dgap_stop(void)
>> +{
>> + ulong lock_flags;
OK. I will send this patch again after changing ulong to "unsigned long".
>
> This is non-standard. Traditionally it would be:
>
> unsigned long flags;
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Thanks
regards,
Daeseok Youn
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
