On 07/17/2014 10:40 PM, Himangi Saraogi wrote:
This patch introduces the use of iio_device_register and does away with
the call to the corressponding unregister function in the probe and
remove functions of the driver respectively.

Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

No, you changed the relative order in which iio_device_unregister() and adis_cleanup_buffer_and_trigger() are called, this opens up the way for race conditions. Rule of thumb: Don't convert drivers to managed functions if this will change the order in which functions will called on device removal.

- Lars

---
  drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16203_core.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16203_core.c 
b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16203_core.c
index 409a28e..5077779 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16203_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/accel/adis16203_core.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int adis16203_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
        if (ret)
                goto error_cleanup_buffer_trigger;

-       ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
+       ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
        if (ret)
                goto error_cleanup_buffer_trigger;

@@ -191,7 +191,6 @@ static int adis16203_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
        struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
        struct adis *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);

-       iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
        adis_cleanup_buffer_and_trigger(st, indio_dev);

        return 0;


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to