On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote:

Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:00:16 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
To: Gary Rookard <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
    [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: bcm: DDRInit: fixed issues w/ commenting.

Gary emailed me privately that fixing my comments would be a problem.

1)  Greg complained about your earlier patch where you moved the
comments from this:
        /* comment */
        code();

To this:
        code(); /* comment */

Greg's complaint was not about that you were doing more than one thing
per patch it was that the comment style was better in the original.

2) A lot of newbies have problems with understanding where the line
between doing one thing per patch and doing two things in a patch is.
You are allowed to make *tiny* changes if they are closely related to
the central thrust of the patch.

So in this case the patch would be:

Staging: bcm: DDRInit: fix up some comments

I have removed the C99 comments.  Some comments were bogus so instead of
fixing them, I just deleted them.  I made a few minor grammar, spelling
and white space fixes as well.

It's still one thing which is "fixing comments".

regards,
dan carpenter


--
Understood, and trying to comply to that principal.

Thanks,
Gary Rookard
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to