> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 1:40 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Mike Christie; Jack Wang; Greg KH; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Drivers: scsi: FLUSH timeout
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:53 PM, KY Srinivasan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am not sure how that magic number was arrived at (the 60HZ number). We
> want this to be little higher -
>
> "60 * HZ" means "60 seconds".
>
> > would there be any issues raising this to say 180 seconds. This is the
> > value we
> currently have for I/O
> > timeout.
>
> So you want to replace it by "180 * HZ", which is ... another magic number?
Ideally, I want this to be adjustable like the way we can change the I/O
timeout.
Since that has been attempted earlier and rejected (not clear what the reasons
were),
I was suggesting that we pick a larger number. James, let me know how I should
proceed here.
Regards,
K. Y
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> [email protected]
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
