On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:11:47AM -0400, Lidza Louina wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Sachin Kamat <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This check is not required.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Lidza Louina <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_kcompat.h | 5 -----
> > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_kcompat.h
> > b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_kcompat.h
> > index ed85152..eaec7e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_kcompat.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_kcompat.h
> > @@ -28,11 +28,6 @@
> > #ifndef __DGNC_KCOMPAT_H
> > #define __DGNC_KCOMPAT_H
> >
> > -# ifndef KERNEL_VERSION
> > -# define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
> > -# endif
> > -
> > -
> > #if !defined(TTY_FLIPBUF_SIZE)
> > # define TTY_FLIPBUF_SIZE 512
> > #endif
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
>
> This looks great. Thanks. :)
So, is that your "implied" ack? :)
In the future, for patches you review and want me to apply, you can say:
Acked-by: Yourname <email>
or, even better, as you are the maintainer, and I should be getting your
signed off for all patches for the driver:
Signed-off-by: Yourname <email>
I'll just take this one for am implied ack for now, but in the future,
it would be good to have an explicit one :)
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
