Jerome Glisse wrote: > Hi, > > So here is a patch which convert bo_init to use struct ttm_placement > rather than flag. It allow the driver to give placement preference > on where to create a bo. Also allow to create a bo at specific range > which is i believe somethings nouveau would like to see :) > > Aside from the change i renamed ttm_buffer_object_init|validate to > ttm_bo_init|validate this is shorter but also more consistent with > others functions naming. For consistency i would like to rename > struct ttm_buffer_object to struct ttm_bo but this lead to massive > regular expression abuse for everyone using ttm so before proposing > a patch let me know if you like or not this. I haven't strong > feeling on that except that this would allow to stay in the 80 line > lenght in some place. > > Cheers, > Jerome > > Jerome, this looks good and consistent with previous changes.
In order to get the vmwgfx driver ready for upstream in the not too distant future we need a (temporarily) stable API. Is this patch targeted for 2.6.33? /Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
