On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we
> > shouldn't put the retry code there but rather in the individual ioctls
> > that needed it.  We should probably do that separately anyway though if
> > we ever decide to.
>
> That wasn't me; I'm all for additional levels of bullet-proofing when it
> comes to EINTR as it's hard to test all of the code paths.
>
> > +libdrm_la_LIBADD = -lrt
>
> I fear you'll need autoconf-fu for this?
>
> Otherwise, it looks like a reasonable plan.

I'm but an autoconf grasshopper.  If there's a better way of doing this I'm 
open to suggestions.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to