http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11594
------- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-16 05:24 PST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > This means the position invariant will work > correctly, but the user will still get an assertion if they create a > non-position invariant program that does not write result.position. I believe > this is the correct behaviour, as (iirc) result.position must be written for > the program to be valid. No, this is not true. Programs are indeed valid if they don't write position (and even if they were not abort would not be an option). The spec explicitly mentions this, though results are undefined. So either drop to swrast if the driver can't handle it at all, or just write that position and be done with it if it works well enough, as results are undefined it must just not lock up doesn't really matter how results turn out... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
