Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3956
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-07 01:36 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> This should be fixed by recent (less than an hour ago) commits. Could you
> please re-test with current CVS?
I have updated to last CVS and the problem is the same: mach64_dri.so made by
Mesa does not work. There is a similar problem with unichrome:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7886004&forum_id=6511.
And Mesa driver for i915 also fails with symptoms similar to the ones I had
before:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7882216&forum_id=6511
Anyway, right now, if I set "#define DriDrivers mach64" in host.def, when
installing xorg it installs a /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mach64_dri.so which
looks to work fine and with the same speed I had before this problem (previous
trials with this approach gave me lower speed).
Now, for me, the question is, would mach64_dri.so from Mesa have better
performance than the one compiled from the xc folder? if the answer is "no",
at least in my system compilation and install of Mesa driver would be
unnecessary.
If you want me to test anything more, please, tell me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
