Jon Smirl wrote:
On 7/12/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 11:17, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 7/12/05, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 10:03, Jon Smirl wrote:
Is there a way to build DRI exactly like X needs from the mesa tree or
can this only be done instead the X tree? If I made the right set of
stubs could I build in the mesa tree? Do I need to define
GLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA?
Huh? How is 'make linux-dri' insufficient?
If I follow all of the make files it looks like linux-dri is using a
glx from the mesa tree instead of the one from xorg. That's what
GLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA controls.
The imake files turn it on:
lib/GL/glx/Imakefile: XMESA_DEFINES = -DGLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA
lib/GL/mesa/drivers/x11/Imakefile: XMESA_DEFINES = -DGLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA
The "glx from the Mesa tree" is the GLX client side library. It used to live
in xc; now it doesn't. src/glx/x11 is the canonical location for the GLX
client library. It is, in other words, exactly what X needs.
So GLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA is old? I just did a 'make World' and it didn't
appear in the logs.
GLX_BUILT_IN_XMESA is old stuff and should probably be removed. The
idea was for libGL to fall back to stand-alone Mesa Xlib rendering if
the X server didn't support the GLX extension. That was important for
some of the distros years ago.
This is the new one, GLX_USE_MESA?
I don't remember what that one does off-hand.
-Brian
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
