On 6/21/05, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/21/05, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/21/05, Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While this will probably work today it will leave little room for future > > > applications of DRI. > > > > Can XvMC needs be handled via the V4L interface? I would expect an > > some point relevant V4L drivers will also get integrated into the > > DRM/fbdev composite driver. > > the problem is v4l is linux specific while XvMC is X specific and > hence multi-platform, plus it has ties to Xv, which would need to be > handled as well.
Don't we already have an Xv for V4L driver for X? Can't XvMC follow the same model? -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
