On 6/17/05, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 20:58 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After launching several times flgrx and dumping the reg > > and diffing against what was reg with r300 here is the list > > of reg that have always on my card (RV350NJ) the same > > value (for the same screen resolution). I think that one > > of the unknown reg maybe a group of them are the key > > one but anyway i wasn't able to write to most of this reg. > > They may are read only thus i tried writing random things > > in register near them but i only succeed to lockup the card > > and the reg i was interested in didn't change. > > > > Thus if anyone got any info on any of this reg, some must > > be in old radeon spec but i haven't this specs and don't > > understand from their name what they do (not all :)). > > > > Maybe dumping value that fglrx set in this reg on other > > card could be usefull.... > > > > For the know reg i have put their name either taken > > from xorg reg list of from fb radeon one. The second > > value is what fglrx set in them r300 value is different. > > > 0x0148 0xfffff000 RADEON_MC_FB_LOCATION > > 0x014c 0xfdfffc00 RADEON_MC_AGP_LOCATION > > The above is weird / bogus ... looks like FB an AGP are overlapping in > card's space, doesn't look right... Are you sure that's what fglrx is > setting ?
Didn't pay much attention to this 2 regs but effectively it looks bogus... I will redump later this day when i can access the computer. I may have mess with cut & paste... Jerome Glisse ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
