On Sun, 1 May 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev writes:
* the R300 driver derived from it appears under the same license due to the notices left over from R200 files (as we originally thought to merge the code in R200).
This needs approval from everyone who contributed to R300 - please let me know !
What exactly needs approval? The current license, or are you proposing a change to the license?
Just wanted to confirm that everyone is ok with MIT/X11 license.
It was never explicit before - my fault, I was having too much fun playing with the code :)
As far as the tiny bit of code that I have contributed is concerned, I am happy for it to be under MIT/X11, BSD, LGPL or GPL. Your choice. :)
Thank you !
Vladimir Dergachev
Paul.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
