Re: Why does thread support depend on GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING in libGL?

[Keith Packard]

On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 09:07 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> While working on bug #3024, I noticed something kind of odd.  Every 
> place where there is code that depends on XTHREADS being defined, it 
> also depends on GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING being defined.  The net result 
> being that the only time you get thread safety in libGL (i.e., a GLX 
> context per thread) is when GLX_DIRECT_RENDERING is defined.  This seems 
> wrong.

As an aside -- there's a way to detect XTHREADS support in the local
Xlib so that libGL can be built correctly if you like.

I use the following snippet in various configure.ac files:

        AC_MSG_CHECKING([for XTHREADS in Xlib])
        AC_RUN_IFELSE(
           [AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#include <X11/Xlib.h>]],
                            [[return XInitThreads() == 0 ? 0 : 1;]])],
           [xthreads=no],
           [xthreads=yes],
           [xthreads=yes])

        AC_MSG_RESULT($xthreads)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part