On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:08:27AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > Oh, but I was not suggesting that. I just meant that interrupt handling > > > code is self-contained and can easily serve several consumers. > > > > I'm with you here. And the same should IMHO hold for DMA handling. And for > > memory management of course. > > DMA handling is the main piece of what the DRM does,
The actual bits that feed DMA buffers to the hardware are very small. And I just meant that like the IRQ code those need to be easily accessible from other components (fbdev, video capture module etc.) -- Ville Syrj�l� [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
