> /* if we haven't dma then no need for this control */
> if (!(dev->driver_features & DRIVER_HAVE_DMA))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Shouldn't this be DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ ?
>
the old code was
#if __HAVE_IRQ || __HAVE_DMA
[DRM_IOCTL_NR(DRM_IOCTL_CONTROL)] = { DRM(control), 1, 1
},
#endif
and I mistranslated that || as an &&, so I've removed the check from the
top of the control fn... the HAVE_IRQ test is further in for backwards
compat..
Dave.
> BTW, sorry Erdi for attributing this to your patch.
>
> /Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
> FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
> Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Dri-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie
pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
