On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Jon Smirl wrote: > At the X Developers Conference there was a discussion of the issues around > framebuffer and DRI. Theodore Ts'o suggested that I write it up and post it for > discussion. I'm going to try and list all of the issues I've heard from all > sides so some of the proposed solutions are in conflict. The goal of this list > is to provide direction for a topic discussion at the Ottawa Kernel Summit.
[...] > A major topic that I missed in the original list was how to handle BSD. DRM is > under the BSD license and FB is GPL. If these two code bases are merged, what > are we going to do about BSD? I don't know the appropriate BSD lists to post > this to so please forward as necessary. What is exactly your question concerning licenses? > Another topic that I missed was, why did kgi fail and what can we do to avoid > repeating the same path this time around. KGI failed to be accepted by linus/linux. You surely don't want repeating this ;) Otherwise, its design is still valid, I believe. -- Nicholas Souchu - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
