On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 22:34, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Michel DÃnzer wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 00:12, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > >>+ if (dev_priv->is_r200) > >>+ filename="r200_cp_microcode"; > >>+ else > >>+ filename="radeon_cp_microcode"; > > > > > > As discussed before, the microcode should be versioned; it might be a > > good idea to start right away, e.g. "r200_cp_microcode-0" etc. > Hmm. That would mean that a particular driver version requires a > particular microcode version. Is that the case?....
The idea is that the version gets bumped if the microcode is ever changed in an incompatible way. PS: With my list admin hat on, I'd appreciate if you could subscribe if you're going to keep posting. Thank you. -- Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
