On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 20:09, sottek wrote: > Can we wrap this up the discussion and try to get to a consensus on > design requirements? I think most of the opinions are starting to > solidify enough to start hashing out the requirements and actual > design.
I agree, and I like your initial list of requirements. > Also, we probably want to drop the communication down to just one > list? I think dri-devel seems to have the widest group of subscribers. I agree with Geert, that probably doesn't cut it. Maybe start a new list and widely send out invitations to discuss the design there? -- Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
