> > > > Is anyone against just including mach64 in the trunk? I know it' still > unsecure and unstable, but so is savage and that's in the trunk. We > don't have to build it by default. plus it would avoid having to > update the makefiles on the branch everytime mesa changes and the trunk > gets updated.
I've no objections, I'd prefer it at this stage .. keeping track of Mesa is non-trivial.. and CVS doesn't do my idea of branching very well :-) Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
