On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 12:57, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel DÃnzer wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:25, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > >>>It shouldn't be very hard to do this for: > >>>sis, tdfx, i810, i830, savage, gamma > >> > >>so are we making the Mesa tree the DRM master repo as opposed to the DRI > >>tree? I don't remember much discussion on this either way, > > > > > > Indeed, and I don't particularly like the idea. > > My preference was always for it to live in a tree of its own.
Glad we agree on that. :) > That does leave the question of how you get at the headers in > dependent projects. Indeed. In the long run, we could e.g. try to get the headers relevant to userspace included in /usr/include/linux (and the BSD equivalent). In the short term, including a copy of _just the headers required to build_ (and if necessary, reorganise the headers such that those are minimal) wouldn't be the worst idea I think. -- Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
