--- Brian Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Keith has mentioned a few times over the years, another approach to > unifying libGLcore.a and the *_dri.so drivers would be replace the > XMesa stuff with a new DRI pseudo-hardware driver that used software > fallbacks for everything. That is, completely remove the XMesa stuff > from the picture.
I'm not following this thread very closely, but there is a standalone framebuffer driver already in the tree, mesa/drivers/dri/fb. Is that what you mean by a DRI pseudo-hardware driver? We we get to a world of OpenGL as the low level driver interface, I was going to use the fb driver to support older hardware. ===== Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
